Department of Energy Refuses to Restore Environmental Monitoring to Georgia Communites Near Nuclear Site

The Department of Energy (DOE) announced Tuesday that it does not plan to restore environmental monitoring to Georgia communities surrounding the Savannah River Site (SRS), a US nuclear weapons complex notorious for its Cold War legacy radioactive waste.

This monitoring, which was cut in Georgia 2003, tests drinking water, rain, crops, fish, air and more near SRS in order to protect residents in poor and rural areas, including Georgia's Burke and Screven Counties, where many people rely on water from private wells, home-grown crops and fish from the Savannah River.

"The DOE's obstruction to environmental monitoring in Georgia is a gross example of environmental injustice," Bobbie Paul, Georgia WAND Executive Director said. "Radiation does not acknowledge state boundaries. The people living downwind and downstream of SRS deserve to know what's in the water, air and food that they consume."

In 2010, then DOE Assistant Secretary, Dr. Ines Triay pledged that monitoring would be restored to Georgia with a 5-year contract independent of any restrictions from SRS. In February 2011, SRS and DOE reached a deal with the Georgia Environmental Protection Division for $700,000 annually with the agreement that the check would be delivered to Georgia within 30 days. The money was never sent and in July 2011, DOE reported they would only fund $300,000 annually, less than half of what the program received annually when the its funding was cut in 2003. Now, the offer is off the table.

The DOE, which still funds $1.5 million annually for monitoring in South Carolina, said funding it in Georgia would be redundant, and that the money is not available. But Georgia citizens living near SRS are concerned about their safety.

"I've lost sisters, brothers, cousins and friends to cancer. Every family I know has lost somebody," Annie Laura Stephens, president of the Burke County National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, who grew up and lives near SRS, said. "We've tried to have meetings to find out what's going on in our area, we're still in the dark. It seems that nobody is listening but Jesus."

The most recent Georgia monitoring data (from 2002) released in 2004 by the Georgia Environmental Protection Division shows elevated levels of radioactive tritium in Georgia communities surrounding SRS. The report showed dangerously high levels in river water, drinking water, fish and leafy vegetation.

Known by local residents as 'the bomb plant', SRS is currently tasked with waste management, waste clean-up after reprocessing, plutonium disposition, and tritium production for nuclear weapons. It is a national superfund site, and has a legacy of contamination spanning back to the Cold War, which is why environmental monitoring was originally implemented there.

Add comment

IMPORTANT! Comments by unregistered users and members not signed in are reviewed before publication. Guest comments are subject to deletion at the sole discretion of the Admin staff. Site membership provides extra privileges including unmoderated commenting, editing comments, commenting and voting on other comments, unlimited comment length and more. Register or sign in now!

Security code
Refresh

East Mountain Insurors
Business and personal insurance; independent agent

star A-List Childcare
`A-list` childcare when and where you need it!

Georgia Basketball Academy
Personalized basketball training for college, middle and high school boys and girls

E-Verify Gwinnett
Confused by the new law? E-Verify as low as $5.95, no setup fee and no monthly fee.

Search the Archives

Member Login

Registration is required to access premium article commenting

TalkGwinnett welcomes your submissions for our home page. We will publish press releases for business and networking groups, community organizations and government agencies. Submit your article here or email to somebody@talkgwinnett.com. The opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of TalkGwinnett or its Publisher, Shoestring Solutions.